(1/14) When offensive coordinator Ken Wisenhunt turned down the Oakland job last year, most people assumed he was coming back to become Bill Cowher's successor. When Cowher retired as expected, it almost seemed like a certainty that either Wisenhunt or assistant head coach Russ Grimm would get the job, with Wiz being the favorite. Well, that's not going to happen. Wisenhunt has been hired by the Arizona Cardinals. The details haven't come out yet, but I'd have to guess that if the Steelers really wanted Wiz, they would have made him the offer by now knowing full well the Cardinals were closing in on him. I'd also have to think that Wisenhunt would have told the Rooney's that he would have chosen the Steelers job over the Arizona job if they were ready to give it to him.
I really thought that the Steelers would want to keep the consistency of the past few years going by making Wiz the coach. Obviously they are going in a different direction. They may have chosen Grimm instead, but if that were the case, why haven't they offered him the job yet? And why are they bringing in Chan Gailey?? This process is much more interesting than I thought it would be.
Will the Steelers bring Gailey back? Will they hire the token guy, who like Cowher in 1992 is young and full of entusiasm? Will they do something off the wall like wait to see if the Chargers can Marty Schottenheimer after he blew yet ANOTHER huge playoff game today? (side note: I cannot believe it's going to be Colts-Pats in the AFC title game! What a crazy, crazy season this has been). If I had to wager a guess, it would be this: they want Ron Rivera. Since the Bears advanced to the NFC Championship Game today (eat it, Seattle!), the Steelers cannot interview Rivera again until after Chicago's season ends. They may just wait for that. Rivera seems to be a good fit. He has helped build amazing defenses in both Philly and Chicago. Unlike Wiz and Grimm, he is a defensive coach, and you know that is what the Steelers would prefer. Again, this is all speculation. I guess we'll just have to wait to see how this plays out.
(1/11) Time for some random thoughts:
- Everyone seems so certain that Bill Cowher will return to coaching in two or three seasons. That may very well be true, but I keep thinking back to when Barry Sanders (maybe my all-time favorite non-Steelers player) announced his retirement. Everyone laughed it off. They said the same things that they are saying about Cowher - Barry is too young to retire, he is too competitive to stay on the sidelines, he just wants a fresh start somewhere else, ect. Every time a team needed a running back, the rumors started to swirl that Sanders was their man. But the whole time Barry Sanders never flinched. He was indeed done with pro football. Now, I'm not saying that Cowher will take the same route. I'm just saying that no one knows for sure.
- Now that the Steelers have apparently wasted everyone's time with the token interview of Mike Tomlin, can we PLEASE put an end to this absurd (and completely racist) Rooney Rule? If you don't already know, the NFL requires teams who are searching for a head coach to interview at least one minority. It's called the Rooney rule because Dan Rooney was the architect behind it. While it may have good intentions, all it really ends up doing is turning black head coaching candidates into token interviews. This not only wastes their time, but it also insults and misleads them. I wish the NFL would quit trying to show everyone how politically correct they are.
- The Steelers face a fairly easy off-season this year in terms of free agents, but next year is going to be HUGE. Four prominent starters - Joey Porter, Aaron Smith, Troy Polamalu, and Alan Faneca - are going to be eligible for unrestricted free agency unless the Steelers can work out a deal with them beforehand (starters Kendall Simmons, Clark Haggans, and Dan Kreider will also be in the same boat). If you read this site regularly, you already know what I think about Porter, so I'll be happy when he is finally gone. Troy could probably be franchised - something the Steelers haven't done since they put the tag on Carnell Lake over a decade ago - if for no other reason that the average salary of the top five NFL safeties are not that much. That would leave Faneca and Smith. If the Steelers are forced into choosing between them, they have to re-sign Faneca. This past season proved how absolutely vital the offensive line is to the success of the franchise, and Faneca ranks right behind Mike Webster and Dermontti Dawson as the best o-linemen in Steelers history. No offense to Smith, who is maybe the most underrated player on the team. Hopefully they will find a way to keep them both.
- All season long I've been getting more and more annoyed with the media worship of the Dallas Cowboys. This is nothing new of course. After all, it was the media who propagated their image as "America's Team" during the 1970's (because apparently back then, "America" was all about losing multiple Super Bowls to the Steelers). However, this year they took their love to new extremes. We were force fed daily stories about the Bill Parcells-Terrell Owens relationship even though nothing significant really happened (especially when you compare with TO's previous two teams). Then when Tony Romo took over at QB and beat up on a few bad teams, he was anointed as the best quarterback since Johnny Unitas. The media put Romo on a pedestal and jubilantly proclaimed that the Cowboys were Super Bowl favorites. Then it all fell apart. Dallas lost three out of their last four games, barely squeezed into the playoffs, and then blew the Wild Card Playoff game to another team who was going into the tank (Seattle) when Romo botched a perfect snap on a game-winning 19-yard field goal attempt. You may have thought that disaster would have marked the end of the media worship, but you would have been wrong.
All this week we have been bombarded with stories about the "controversial" k-ball. For those who don't already know, back in the mid-1990's the NFL wanted to curb the success of the kicking game, so they introduced a bunch of rules that they thought would make for exciting kick returns and encourage teams to go for touchdowns rather than field goals. Rules included shortening the kicking tee, moving kickoffs back five yards, and using the k-ball, which is a new ball taken right out of the box (because in the past, kickers would get a hold of the game ball before a game and work it in so it would be easier to handle). Kickers, punters, and long-snappers have long complained about the k-ball but have received almost zero attention - until now, that is.
How could Romo have mishandled such an easy snap when he is the greatest football player of our generation? Could it be because of this slippery new ball that they MADE him use?? How unjust!! Nevermind the fact that at least two other playoff games since the introduction of the k-ball - the 1999 NFC Divisional Playoff game between the Redskins and Bucs, and the 2002 NFC Wild Card Playoff game between the Giants and 49ers - have been lost on botched snaps with NO mention whatsoever about the impact of the k-ball. Nevermind the fact that multiple playoff games have been lost on missed field goals (Gary Anderson, Nate Kaeding, Doug Brien, Mike Vanderjagt, ect) since the the introduction of this ball. Never once was it the k-ball's fault. But because it happened to the beloved Dallas Cowboys and their Golden Boy QB, now all of a sudden it's a big deal. I really have nothing against Romo or any of the other Dallas players (except Owens), and I can't stand the whiny Seahawks, but I am so glad Dallas is done because I can't handle any more of this media love affair. It's just gotten beyond ridiculous.
Copyright © 2007 - All Rights Reserved